Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Mark Clough
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina Korgol
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

BEREC: Draft report on over the top (OTT) services says ‘there is no need of necessary level playing field between telecom operator and internet-based competitors’. Submissions open until 2 November

October 6, 2015By Preiskel & Co

The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) has opened a consultation on its draft report on OTT services, published yesterday. The consultation will close on 2 November.

The draft report considers that companies that offer OTT telecom-like services such as Skype and Whatsapp, should not be necessarily regulated as claimed by traditional telecom operators. The final report will be then issued by BEREC in the context of the review of the current EU regulatory framework for electronic communications (ECN/S Framework).

 

About the BEREC

The BEREC is composed of the representative of the communications regulators of all the Member States of the European Union. It was established by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 adopted in November 2009, as part of the ECN/S Framework package. It replaced the European Regulators Group for electronic communications networks and services which was established as an advisory group to the Commission in 2002.

BEREC assists the Commission and the national regulatory authorities (NRAs) in implementing the ECN/S Framework. It provides advice on request and on its own initiative to the European institutions and complements at European level the regulatory tasks performed at national level by the NRAs. The NRAs and the Commission have to take utmost account of any opinion, recommendation, guidelines, advice or regulatory best practice adopted by BEREC.

Therefore, public consultations on BEREC’s reports represent an extremely useful tool for market operators to ensure that their views and needs are taken into account by the EU regulators when preparing a legislative proposal.

 

Background

OTT is a term frequently used but often not clearly defined. Some use this term to define a group of actors, while others to qualify a category of services.

In its draft report, BEREC defines an OTT service as “content, a service or an application that is provided to the end user over the open Internet.” This means that the term OTT does not refer to a particular type of service but to a method of provision, namely provision over the open Internet. The provision generally occurs independent of the Internet access provider in control or distribution of the service. BEREC distinguishes three types of OTT services:

  • OTT-0 services, which are OTT services that qualify as electronic communication services (ECSs);
  • OTT-1 services, which are OTT services that do not qualify as ECS but do potentially compete with ECSs; and
  • OTT-2 services, which are the remaining category consisting of OTT services that are not an ECS and do not potentially compete with ECSs.

A first objective of the consultation is to define the OTT services. Part of this task is to identify which OTT services qualify as ECSs in a legal sense and therefore should comply with the current rules and regulations set out in the ECN/S Framework.

A second objective of the report is to assess if the OTT phenomenon should be considered within the ECN/S Framework review. As part of this second objective, BEREC looks at differences in the regulatory treatment of ECSs and OTT services that potentially compete with ECSs and whether or not this could distort the level playing field.

To this regard, traditional telecom providers have complained for several years that they suffer a competitive disadvantage with respect to internet-based services competing on telephony and messaging (e.g. Viber, Facebook Messenger, Skype, WhatsApp). Indeed, traditional operators are subject to rules including price caps, obligations to serve disabled users and privacy restrictions, which do not apply to the latter. However, the draft report concludes that the differences in the regulatory treatment between ECS and OTT services involve many relevant considerations and that the ‘level playing field’ is only one of them.

Finally, the draft report also considers (i) OTT services that do not potentially compete with ECS and (ii) partnerships between ECS and OTT providers. BEREC considers that although both in general lie outside the scope of NRA’s competence currently, they could have an effect on competition and consumers in the markets for ECSs.

 

Contact us

Please contact Jose Saras and Gianpaolo Gangemi to request further information.

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access rights
    January 19, 2023
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU
    January 12, 2023
  • Saving the WWW from the W3C
    December 20, 2022
  • Imminent US adequacy decision to be met by legal challenges from privacy advocates
    December 13, 2022
  • Preiskel & Co Client, Nadira Murray’s awards for film “Winners”
    December 13, 2022
  • Telecoms Security Framework (TSF) – Background and Requirements
    December 8, 2022
  • Updated EU Commission decision paves way for 5G on the road and in-flight connectivity innovation
    November 29, 2022
  • Controller Binding Corporate Rules – EDPB adopts new recommendations on the application for approval and the elements and principles of the Rules
    November 25, 2022
  • ICO reveals new transfer risk assessment tool
    November 25, 2022
  • Ofcom publishes new rules for telecoms providers to combat scam calls
    November 23, 2022
  • The Future Is Now: The Disruptive Power of AI and Its Legal Ramifications in The Metaverse
    November 9, 2022
  • CJEU clarifies the interpretation of purpose and storage limitation principles under the GDPR
    October 27, 2022

The Preiskel Blog

  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access rights 19 Jan 2023
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU 12 Jan 2023
  • Saving the WWW from the W3C 20 Dec 2022
  • Imminent US adequacy decision to be met by legal challenges from privacy advocates 13 Dec 2022

Preiskel news

  • Preiskel & Co’s corporate team advised IXAfrica regarding a highly significant technology infrastructure investment for East Africa
  • Preiskel & Co’s Technology M&A Global Practice Guide published by Chambers
  • Preiskel & Co Client, Nadira Murray’s awards for film “Winners”
  • Preiskel & Co ranked in Chambers for FinTech Legal, Data Protection and Cyber Security
Preiskel tweets
  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access… https://t.co/J39PFCbg0I7 days ago
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU. Find out more here: https://t.co/Or9NlgMfXT #CyberSecurity14 days ago
  • Preiskel & Co’s corporate team advised IXAfrica regarding a highly significant technology infrastructure investment… https://t.co/iAVpUxhttj17 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy