Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina James
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
    • Rachael Machado
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

CMA launches consultation on proposed commitments from Google in ‘Privacy Sandbox’ investigation

June 14, 2021By Preiskel & Co

On Friday 11 June 2021, the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) announced that it was minded to accept undertakings from Google to settle its antitrust investigation into the company regarding its ‘Privacy Sandbox’ proposals.

The CMA launched its investigation in January 2021, following complaints from industry, including Marketers for an Open Web, a consortium of companies affected which is represented by Preiskel & Co’s Competition and Antitrust team.

The ‘Privacy Sandbox‘ is a collection of proposed changes to Google’s browser, Chrome, and browser engine, Chromium. The proposed changes include the removal of third party cookies, the replacement of direct log-in with a login system via the browser (“WebID“), the hiding of IP addresses from website publishers by running all traffic through Google’s servers (“Gnatcatcher“), and the deprecation of the User Agent String, a part of the HTTP communications protocol which tells websites certain information about the device accessing the website, and replacement with User Agent Client Hints.

As indicated by the name for the group of proposals, Google has claimed that they are being implemented in order to address user privacy concerns. However, concerns have been raised by Marketers for an Open Web and others. These concerns include that the browser changes would allow Google to continue to gather data which it monetises through advertising while preventing Google’s competitors in digital advertising from accessing the same data, and that there is very little user choice built into the proposals, raising questions about compliance with data protection legislation.

Such concerns caused the CMA to open its investigation, the first Competition Act 1998 investigation announced after the end of the Brexit transition period, and work with the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) to consider the implications of the proposals. The announcement of the consultation follows a recent joint statement from the CMA and the ICO on how they consider regulators should approach questions of competition law and data protection law in digital markets.

Following almost six months of investigation, the CMA has confirmed that it considers that the ‘Privacy Sandbox’ proposals raise competition concerns. Google has submitted proposed undertakings, legally binding commitments to modify its behaviour to address such concerns, which the CMA provisionally considers appropriate.

The proposed undertakings would give the CMA an oversight role in the development and implementation of the changes to the browser. This is understood to be the first time that commitments to end an investigation would include such an involved ongoing role for the CMA, and indicates that the CMA is flexing how it applies its powers to address some of the difficulties which arise in competition law enforcement in digital markets.

Stakeholders are invited to provide submissions to the CMA on the proposed undertakings, in particular on whether the proposed commitments are sufficient to address the competition concerns highlighted regarding:

  1. unequal access to the functionality associated with user tracking;
  2. self-preferencing Google’s own ad tech providers and owned and operated ad inventory; and
  3. imposition of unfair terms on Chrome’s web users.

The CMA press release can be read here. The consultation page is here. The deadline for responses to the consultation is 8 July 2021.

Please contact Tim Cowen if you have any questions regarding the CMA’s investigation or the consultation.

 

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Advocate General Opinion on Automated Credit-Scoring & Retention of Insolvency Data
    March 28, 2023
  • White House’s Economic Report of the President sets out a roadmap to improve competition in digital markets
    March 22, 2023
  • Brussels Conference brings in industry leaders to discuss the international antitrust landscape
    March 22, 2023
  • Issues in the UK’s forthcoming Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill
    March 17, 2023
  • Stormy weather for cloud computing in the EU
    March 16, 2023
  • Inmarsat Takeover Provisionally Cleared for Take-Off
    March 10, 2023
  • EDPB’s Feedback on the New EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
    March 6, 2023
  • UK Data Reform Bill to return to the House of Commons
    March 3, 2023
  • DCMS Publishes New Security and Privacy Principles for App Store Operators and Developers
    February 16, 2023
  • DPO’s Dismissal & Conflicts of Interest Under The EU GDPR – CJEU Ruling
    February 14, 2023
  • ICO – Change of Deadline for Reporting Breach Notifications for Communication Service Providers
    February 6, 2023
  • General EU Requirements for Cookie Banners – EDPB Task Force Report
    January 27, 2023

The Preiskel Blog

  • Advocate General Opinion on Automated Credit-Scoring & Retention of Insolvency Data 28 Mar 2023
  • White House’s Economic Report of the President sets out a roadmap to improve competition in digital markets 22 Mar 2023
  • Brussels Conference brings in industry leaders to discuss the international antitrust landscape 22 Mar 2023
  • Issues in the UK’s forthcoming Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill 17 Mar 2023

Preiskel news

  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, quoted by IT Pro on the costs incurred by MNOs
  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, will be a panellist at GCCM Carrier Community 2023 on IOT
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Awarded First Place as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK
  • Ronnie Preiskel chosen to judge 24 May 2023 The Tech Capital Global Awards
Preiskel tweets
  • Advocate General Opinion on Automated Credit-Scoring & Retention of Insolvency Data. Find out more here: https://t.co/bJkvPBvj6F3 hours ago
  • Issues in the UK’s forthcoming Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill. Find out more: https://t.co/3BHP1xq69Y5 days ago
  • White House’s Economic Report of the President sets out a roadmap to improve competition in digital markets. Find o… https://t.co/S7J7sX3kfs6 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy