Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
A boutique law firm in London
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Tina Cowen
    • Xavier Prida
    • Martina Raciti
    • Ewelina James
    • Rachael Machado
    • Maria Constantin
    • Peter Dally
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Paul Stelges
    • Hannah Leader
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Sophia Yakhno
    • Sue Warwick
    • D A T Green
    • Antony Corel
    • Stewart White
    • Mor Swiel
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Robert Harvey
    • Kristiina Kekarainen
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

Commission fines Google €4.34 billion

July 23, 2018By Preiskel & Co

Following a 39-month investigation, the European Commission has finally announced its decision in the Android case, imposing a fine of €4.34 billion and requiring that Google bring an end to its infringing behaviour within 90 days or face penalty fines of up to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover of their parent company, Alphabet.

Tim Cowen, partner at Preiskel & Co and specialist competition lawyer said “The Commission’s decision shows that Google has been breaking the law for many years. How Google remedies the position is not specified. The record fine is a mark of the scale of the infringement. The law requires that Google put forward a remedy- the industry will now wait with baited breath to see what that remedy will be.”

The Commission’s investigation and decision focused on three issues.

  • First, Google required pre-installation of the Google Search and Browser (Chrome) as a condition for licencing the Google app store (Play Store), which is an important marketplace for apps.
  • Second, Google paid manufacturers to ensure that only the Google Search app was installed on devices.
  • Third, Google obstructed the development of competing operating systems which could have provided a platform allowing for rival search engines to develop their offerings. Google prevented manufacturers wishing to pre-install Google apps from selling even a single smart mobile device running on alternative versions of Android that were not approved by Google (so-called “Android forks”)

The Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, stated that, through such conduct, Google had “used Android as a vehicle to cement the dominance of its search engine. These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules.”

The Commission found Google to be dominant in three markets:

  • the market for general internet search services (as was concluded in the Google Shopping Decision);
  • the market for licensable smart mobile operating systems; and
  • the market for app stores for the Android mobile operating system.

Google has announced it will appeal against the Decision.

Read the Commission’s press release here.

For further information please contact Tim Cowen.

AndroidCompetition LawEuropean CommissionfineGoogle
Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Karthyaeni Vittala has been shortlisted by Global Woman Leader Magazine
    November 27, 2023
  • Ofcom £1.4M Fine for Shell Energy re Consumer Protection Breaches of General Conditions
    November 22, 2023
  • Balancing Acts: Data Protection Rights in the Era of New Digital Laws
    November 17, 2023
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Recognised as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK
    November 17, 2023
  • Net Neutrality: An Old Debate in a New World
    November 13, 2023
  • Google’s $93 Million Settlement with California AG – Pragmatic Step for Geolocation Data and Advertising?
    November 9, 2023
  • UK CMA Secures Commitments from Meta over its use of Advertising Data
    November 7, 2023
  • EDPB’s Swift Action: Banning Meta’s Unlawful Behavioural Ads
    November 6, 2023
  • Google and Corint Media Reach Interim Agreement
    November 6, 2023
  • Cyber security and outsourcing failings: FCA fines Equifax Ltd for 2017 cyber breach
    October 31, 2023
  • The Data Privacy Revolution: Meta’s Subscription Shift Sparks Controversy in the EU
    October 30, 2023
  • EU-US Data Privacy Framework Drama: CJEU Dismisses French MP’s Challenge
    October 30, 2023

The Preiskel Blog

  • Karthyaeni Vittala has been shortlisted by Global Woman Leader Magazine 27 Nov 2023
  • Ofcom £1.4M Fine for Shell Energy re Consumer Protection Breaches of General Conditions 22 Nov 2023
  • Balancing Acts: Data Protection Rights in the Era of New Digital Laws 17 Nov 2023
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Recognised as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK 17 Nov 2023

Preiskel news

  • Karthyaeni Vittala has been shortlisted by Global Woman Leader Magazine
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Recognised as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK
  • EDPB’s Swift Action: Banning Meta’s Unlawful Behavioural Ads
  • Tim Cowen, Chair of Antitrust Practice, Preiskel & Co, quoted in The Times
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy