Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Mark Clough
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina Korgol
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

EU Commission Proposal for AI Regulation

May 21, 2021By Preiskel & Co

On 21 April 2021, the European Commission issued a draft proposal for a regulation on AI systems, the first self-standing legal framework regulating AI.  The regulation has a broad scope, imposing obligations on businesses in almost all sectors of the economy. It will not be adopted by UK law, but the regulation does have extra-territorial effect and will influence future laws and regulations in the UK. 

“AI systems” are purposefully broadly defined, meaning that providers, importers, distributors and users are all subject to certain requirements. 

AI systems are regulated on a risk-based approach:

  • the “unacceptable” high risk ones are banned; 
  • the “high risk” ones are subject to strict requirements;
  • the “limited risk” ones are expected to meet transparency requirements; 
  • the “minimal risk” ones are not regulated. 

The regulation is expected to be adopted in the next two years, however it is subject to up to three reviews in the EU Parliament and EU Council before it is approved. 

The draft regulation can be found here. 

Please contact Jose Saras if you have any questions.

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • BEIS releases first annual report on NSIA 2021
    June 23, 2022
  • OFCOM’S GENERAL CONDITIONS CHANGES IN RELATION TO THE EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE
    June 23, 2022
  • UK Government reveals Data Reform Bill
    June 22, 2022
  • A costly factor in enforcement action undermines the Rule of Law: UK Supreme Court Rules on CMA v Pfizer/Flynn costs appeal
    June 20, 2022
  • Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse
    June 16, 2022
  • Record £9bn pumped into UK private tech firms in first three months of 2022, placing UK second behind the US globally
    June 13, 2022
  • EDPB: new sets of guidelines for consultation on the calculation of fines and use of facial recognition technology
    May 26, 2022
  • Claim against NHS Trust for breach of DPA 1998 and misuse of private information dismissed
    April 28, 2022
  • TikTok Class action for the Misuse of Child Personal Data
    April 28, 2022
  • ICO consultation on draft guidance for the research provisions within the UK GDPR and the DPA 2018
    April 20, 2022
  • European Strategy for Artificial Intelligence – a framework to regulate AI and its potential impact on the UK
    April 19, 2022
  • Meta hit by 17 million euro fine by Irish regulator
    April 19, 2022

The Preiskel Blog

  • BEIS releases first annual report on NSIA 2021 23 Jun 2022
  • OFCOM’S GENERAL CONDITIONS CHANGES IN RELATION TO THE EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE 23 Jun 2022
  • UK Government reveals Data Reform Bill 22 Jun 2022
  • A costly factor in enforcement action undermines the Rule of Law: UK Supreme Court Rules on CMA v Pfizer/Flynn costs appeal 20 Jun 2022

Preiskel news

  • Daniel Preiskel and Xavier Prida lecturing to Academia Mexicana del Derecho Informático and Abogado Digital
  • Preiskel & Co advises Mexico-based premium content production company Dopamine
  • Danny Preiskel was ranked as a Global Elite Thought Leader in Telecoms & Media by WhosWhoLegal Data 2022
  • Danny Preiskel featured in GCCM (Global Carrier Community Magazine)
Preiskel tweets
  • RT @VRobCompLaw: Speaker interviews - Competition Law in Conversation Cloud computing is becoming a new frontier for digital competition. W…4 days ago
  • RT @TC_4KBW: A precedent for paying songwriters and creators properly? https://t.co/VZ9E8eJvor6 days ago
  • RT @TC_4KBW: Have we lost the regulatory plot? Is it time to use “R vs Big Tech” when it comes to giving the Digital Markets Unit more powe…6 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2022 | Site map | Legal notices | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Privacy | Fraud Notice