Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
A boutique law firm in London
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Tina Cowen
    • Xavier Prida
    • Martina Raciti
    • Ewelina James
    • Rachael Machado
    • Maria Constantin
    • Peter Dally
    • Richard Stewart
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Paul Stelges
    • Hannah Leader
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Sophia Yakhno
    • Sue Warwick
    • D A T Green
    • Antony Corel
    • Stewart White
    • Mor Swiel
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Robert Harvey
    • Shardi Shameli
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

Getting out of a (data) scrape: global statement published for the protection of publicly accessible personal data online

September 8, 2023By Preiskel & Co

On 24 August 2023, in conjunction with data protection authorities in eleven other countries, the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) published a joint statement regarding data scraping and the protection of privacy.

Data scraping refers to an automated means of extracting data from the web. While not in itself illegal, data protection authorities have reported that incidents involving mass data scraping are increasing, particularly from social media companies (“SMCs”) and other websites hosting publicly available personal data. The consequences of these privacy breaches can be severe and long-term.

The joint statement therefore targeted three key areas: the privacy risks of unlawful data scraping; how SMCs and other websites should the protect personal data for which they are responsible; how individuals can minimise privacy risks from data scraping.

Privacy risks of unlawful data scraping

There are many privacy risks unleashed by the unlawful scraping of personal information, but broadly they may be separated into two categories: the exploitation of personal data to target individuals, and the exploitation of personal data for purposes beyond the knowledge or consent of data subjects.

Individuals may be targeted by personalised cyberattacks, phishing scams, or social engineering, as well as unwanted direct marketing and spam. Without the data subject’s knowledge, this data may be sold for the purposes of identity fraud or unauthorised surveillance. In this way, details of an individual’s finances, personal life, political views, and even movements may be amassed by malicious actors, including unauthorised foreign governments and intelligence agencies.

At the root of the privacy risk to individuals is the loss of control over their personal information, scraped without their knowledge and used for purposes which they neither expected nor agreed to. Once scraped, the personal information may continue to be used and shared in perpetuity, rendering it effectively impossible for an individual to control, limit, or delete their digital presence. Furthermore, this may have a direct negative impact on the digital economy as users become increasingly disillusioned and lose trust in SMCs and other websites.

How SMCs and other websites should protect personal data

In many jurisdictions, it is the legal responsibility of the host SMC or website to protect even publicly accessible personal information from unlawful data scraping. With new methods of data scraping constantly emerging, the statement recommends that SMCs and other websites implement protective measures including for the mitigation of risk which are similarly dynamic. Multi-layered technical and procedural controls are therefore of critical importance.

Controls suggested by the joint statement include: designating dedicated data protection and privacy teams to implement controls and monitor threats, imposing rate limiting access on accounts where unusual or excessive activities are detected, and identifying bots and suspicious IP addresses using techniques like CAPTCHA. Also proposed is the regular monitoring, review, and improvement of these security control frameworks.

In order to build trust with individual users, the SMCs and websites themselves are advised to proactively raise awareness of the risks associated with sharing personal data online, and make transparent the protective measures and privacy settings that they have in place.

How individuals can protect their own personal data

Since no data privacy safeguard can ever be entirely guaranteed, individuals are asked to take a long-term view of the personal information which they choose to share publicly. The statement recommends that users empower and protect themselves by minimising the extent of the data they share, reading the privacy policies provided by the SMCs and websites, reviewing their individual privacy settings, and reporting any abuses to the relevant data protection authority.

Going Forwards

Urging the SMCs and other websites to take action, the statement concludes with an invitation to submit feedback on how they intend to comply by 1 month from the issuance. Although the intended audience encompasses both users and host platforms, it was sent directly to six global sector leaders: Alphabet Inc. (YouTube), ByteDance Ltd. (TikTok), Meta Platforms Inc. (Instagram, Facebook, Threads), Microsoft Corporation (LinkedIn), Sina Corp (Weibo), and X Corp. (X, previously Twitter).

This global initiative, brought together by the Global Privacy Assembly, demonstrates that the international scope of the issues involved is matched by a consistent approach to data protection principles and practice across jurisdictions.

The joint statement on data scraping and the protection of privacy can be found here.

Please contact Jose Saras and Xavier Prida if you have any questions or concerns regarding the above.

The material in this article is only for general review of the topics covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its content.

This article is written in English language. Preiskel & Co LLP is not responsible for any translation of all or part of its content into any language.

Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clear formSubmit

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • CMA AI Report: The Foundation of the UK’s AI Response
    September 21, 2023
  • Navigating Health Data Compliance: A Roadmap for Employers
    September 21, 2023
  • Transatlantic convergence? Recent cases on advertising and privacy from the USA and UK
    September 15, 2023
  • Practical Guide – Net Neutrality in the UK
    September 14, 2023
  • Virgin succeeded in defending a claim by EE for loss of EE’s profits caused by Virgin’s breach of the MVNO Exclusivity Clause
    September 12, 2023
  • Getting out of a (data) scrape: global statement published for the protection of publicly accessible personal data online
    September 8, 2023
  • The dark side of design: the ICO and CMA call for businesses to rethink their website layouts
    August 18, 2023
  • Could the Supreme Court’s ruling on litigation funding agreements cause havoc for litigation funders?
    August 17, 2023
  • US Threats of a ‘Te(ch)xodus’ from the UK?
    August 17, 2023
  • Smoother Sailing for EU-US Data Transfers after GDPR Adequacy Decision
    August 4, 2023
  • Unlocking Data Flows: EU-US Data Privacy Framework Receives Adequacy Decision
    July 13, 2023
  • UK’s World Leading Approach on Artificial Intelligence – White Paper outlines 5 guideline principles for responsible use of AI
    July 5, 2023

The Preiskel Blog

  • CMA AI Report: The Foundation of the UK’s AI Response 21 Sep 2023
  • Navigating Health Data Compliance: A Roadmap for Employers 21 Sep 2023
  • Transatlantic convergence? Recent cases on advertising and privacy from the USA and UK 15 Sep 2023
  • Practical Guide – Net Neutrality in the UK 14 Sep 2023

Preiskel news

  • Practical Guide – Net Neutrality in the UK
  • Danny Preiskel featured in GCCM Magazine (June/July 2023 issue 55)  
  • Danny Preiskel moderating a panel at the MEF Connects – The Future of Fraud Prevention event (5th September 2023, hybrid)
  • Preiskel & Co advised TMT Analysis on the acquisition of Phronesis Technologies
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy