Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Mark Clough
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina Korgol
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

Hearing of Google’s appeal against European Commission Android decision commences

September 28, 2021By Preiskel & Co

On 27 September, the week-long EU General Court hearings began in order to hear Google’s appeal against the European Commission’s 2018 decision which found that Google had abused its dominant position in respect of its Android mobile operating system, and associated fine.

Reports from the hearing indicate that lawyers for both the European Commission and Google have made submissions, including in relation to Google’s dominance and its disputed anti-competitive behaviour.

Counsel for Google has argued that the Commission was erroneous in its market definition, maintaining that it should have included Apple within its definition and did not account for the ability for consumers to switch between iPhones and Android phones. It was argued that Google faces intense competition from Apple.

Google also claimed that the Commission had mistaken foreclosure of competitors for effective competition. The Commission asserted that it had shown that the test for ‘capability to foreclose’ had been met in 2018, and that Google must show its efficiencies to prove otherwise. Counsel for the Commission made the point that the Android ‘MADA’ contracts (those which required phone manufacturers using Android’s operating system to pre-install Chrome and the Play Store), alongside internal documents, showed that Google had actively made it very difficult for competitors to devise a “forked” version of Android. The Commission also highlighted that Google should not need to pre-install its Chrome browser to devices if its product is favoured by consumers – they should be seeking to download it themselves.

Google’s response, including input from intervenors Opera and Gigaset, was that it had not foreclosed competitors but instead enabled them to enter their respective markets and to compete. Furthermore, Google cited evidence that users choose to use Google because they prefer it, stating that the most searched term on Microsoft’s Big search engine was ‘Google’. Google’s counsel also emphasised the ease with which consumers could download alternative apps; users are not forced to use the pre-installed app. The Commission rebutted this argument, citing with reference to evidence from BEUC, that users tend to use what is readily available to them, rather than seeking out alternatives.

The hearing is set to continue until the end of the week, and it is expected that the Commission will rely heavily on the precedent in Microsoft to support its findings in 2018.

Whether the General Court will side with the Commission or Google is unlikely to be known for many months.

Please contact Tim Cowen with questions.

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Claim against NHS Trust for breach of DPA 1998 and misuse of private information dismissed
    April 28, 2022
  • TikTok Class action for the Misuse of Child Personal Data
    April 28, 2022
  • ICO consultation on draft guidance for the research provisions within the UK GDPR and the DPA 2018
    April 20, 2022
  • European Strategy for Artificial Intelligence – a framework to regulate AI and its potential impact on the UK
    April 19, 2022
  • Meta hit by 17 million euro fine by Irish regulator
    April 19, 2022
  • Ofcom has mandated that telecoms providers ensure British Sign Language (BSL) for 999
    March 18, 2022
  • Ofcom publishes statement on the future of telephone numbers
    March 15, 2022
  • German court sends biometric data questions to the ECJ
    February 23, 2022
  • Meta fined £1.5m by CMA
    February 7, 2022
  • International data transfer agreement and addendum laid before Parliament
    February 4, 2022
  • CMA publishes statement of scope in music and streaming market study
    February 1, 2022
  • Google Privacy Sandbox faces European Commission complaint from German publishers
    January 24, 2022

The Preiskel Blog

  • Claim against NHS Trust for breach of DPA 1998 and misuse of private information dismissed 28 Apr 2022
  • TikTok Class action for the Misuse of Child Personal Data 28 Apr 2022
  • ICO consultation on draft guidance for the research provisions within the UK GDPR and the DPA 2018 20 Apr 2022
  • European Strategy for Artificial Intelligence – a framework to regulate AI and its potential impact on the UK 19 Apr 2022

Preiskel news

  • Daniel Preiskel and Xavier Prida lecturing to Academia Mexicana del Derecho Informático and Abogado Digital
  • Preiskel & Co advises Mexico-based premium content production company Dopamine
  • Danny Preiskel was ranked as a Global Elite Thought Leader in Telecoms & Media by WhosWhoLegal Data 2022
  • Danny Preiskel featured in GCCM (Global Carrier Community Magazine)
Preiskel tweets
  • @jwrosewell @m4aow @w3c @IABTechLab Our pleasure!61 days ago
  • RT @jwrosewell: Great work from @Preiskel and the whole @m4aow team. Thank you. Much for @w3c, @IABTechLab, and others to consider in this…61 days ago
  • RT @TC_4KBW: Google’s battle with publishers shows that at every turn it seeks to block others from competing. it blocked header bidding, b…61 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2022 | Site map | Legal notices | Privacy | Cookie Policy | Privacy | Fraud Notice