Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina James
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

London’s domination of commercial claims: on the rise or in decline?

August 25, 2022By Preiskel & co

Questions as to the enduring dominance of London in the realm of commercial claims were raised in a recent article by the Law Society Gazette. It was reported that there has been a marked increase in the number of commercial cases which are being heard outside of the capital.

Year on year, the proportion of such cases heard in London has been decreasing from 79% in 2019/20 to 75% in 2020/21 to 72% this year. Despite this, the gulf of difference between the number of claims heard in London, 5,892, and that of the country’s second city, Manchester, 717, suggest that London will not relinquish its position of dominance any time soon.

From the perspective of foreign commercial litigants, this is a positive move which will unencumber London courts of domestic English cases to some degree. As such, even if London’s domestic dominance may be nominally declining, its international status as a leading global centre for the resolution of contentious matters remains strong.

Background

If a company wishes to embark upon litigation, the advantages of doing so in England, in comparison to most other European jurisdictions, can, in certain cases, be significant. Clients bringing a case in London benefit from a legal infrastructure which has been optimized to deal with complex international commercial disputes.

This is owing, at least in part, to London’s long-held position as a world financial capital which has endured despite several challenges in the last two decades. The longevity of England’s legal tradition, its stability and strong rule of law ensure international litigants fair and impartial proceedings or at least a better chance of this than in many other jurisdictions.

Perhaps most fundamentally, many aspects of English law are inherently favourable to businesses wishing to enforce their rights. ‘Freedom of contract’ and other such concepts allow for much latitude to businesses in the drafting of their agreements, safe in the knowledge that should a dispute arise both parties will be bound to the terms of the agreement.

Clients may appreciate the relative anonymity of UK proceedings should they wish to avoid publicity in their own country. Such reasons explain England’s enduring attractiveness to foreign litigants; figures from 2020 the Commercial Courts in London heard cases involving parties form 72 countries. The presence of such institutions as the international court of arbitration, one of the most significant courts of its kind in the world, serves to further the city’s dominance in this area.

Results

The concerted efforts of English judges such as Mrs. Justice Cockerill to find cases which can be heard outside the capital’s Rolls Building will no doubt lead to a decrease in the overburdening of London courts with cases which could otherwise be heard in other legal centers in the UK.

This practice is reinforced by practice direction 57AA, issued in 2018 for the Business and Property Courts, which stated that most claims with ‘significant links to a particular circuit outside London or the southeast should be issued in the most local district registry’. This direction has been used by judges when calls to move cases to the capital have been considered.

London therefore remains dominant internationally for good reason. Recent moves to dissipate the pressure of local claims to more regional courts and will serve to further enable London courts decide on larger international cases.

If you are considering bringing or defending an international commercial dispute, with the right lawyers, London remains an attractive place to do so. Preiskel & Co has a wealth of experience in international areas such as the establishment of jurisdiction in England and Wales, enforcement of foreign judgments and cross-border asset recovery which can help ensure the best possible chances of success in any such disputes.

 

The material contained in this article is only a general review of the topics covered and does not constitute any legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its content

claimscommerciallitigationLondon
Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • General EU Requirements for Cookie Banners – EDPB Task Force Report
    January 27, 2023
  • Ofcom Launches Investigation into BT Following Suspected Breaches of Consumer Protections Post Implementation of EECC
    January 27, 2023
  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access rights
    January 19, 2023
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU
    January 12, 2023
  • Saving the WWW from the W3C
    December 20, 2022
  • Imminent US adequacy decision to be met by legal challenges from privacy advocates
    December 13, 2022
  • Preiskel & Co Client, Nadira Murray’s awards for film “Winners”
    December 13, 2022
  • Telecoms Security Framework (TSF) – Background and Requirements
    December 8, 2022
  • Updated EU Commission decision paves way for 5G on the road and in-flight connectivity innovation
    November 29, 2022
  • Controller Binding Corporate Rules – EDPB adopts new recommendations on the application for approval and the elements and principles of the Rules
    November 25, 2022
  • ICO reveals new transfer risk assessment tool
    November 25, 2022
  • Ofcom publishes new rules for telecoms providers to combat scam calls
    November 23, 2022

The Preiskel Blog

  • General EU Requirements for Cookie Banners – EDPB Task Force Report 27 Jan 2023
  • Ofcom Launches Investigation into BT Following Suspected Breaches of Consumer Protections Post Implementation of EECC 27 Jan 2023
  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access rights 19 Jan 2023
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU 12 Jan 2023

Preiskel news

  • Danny Preiskel to speak at the Westminster eForum policy conference ‘Next steps for the UK mobile industry’
  • Preiskel & Co’s corporate team advised IXAfrica regarding a highly significant technology infrastructure investment for East Africa
  • Preiskel & Co’s Technology M&A Global Practice Guide published by Chambers
  • Preiskel & Co Client, Nadira Murray’s awards for film “Winners”
Preiskel tweets
  • Danny Preiskel to speak at the @WeFEvents eForum policy conference ‘Next steps for the UK mobile industry’. Find ou… https://t.co/ELDiFBj6Zo3 days ago
  • General EU Requirements for Cookie Banners – EDPB Task Force Report. Find out more here: https://t.co/2yGdpzOEZp #cookies #EDPB8 days ago
  • Ofcom Launches Investigation into BT Following Suspected Breaches of Consumer Protections Post Implementation of EE… https://t.co/7hgZjWQ16T8 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy