Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Richard Stewart
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Stewart White
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Shardi Shameli
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Ewelina James
    • Maria Constantin
    • Sophia Yakhno
    • Rachael Machado
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

New York lawsuit filed against Facebook for excluding rival photo app

November 8, 2021By Preiskel & Co

On 4 November 2021, an antitrust lawsuit was filed against Facebook’s parent, Meta, in the Southern District of New York. Facebook has been accused of having excluded rival photo app, Phhhoto, from access to its platform, and for replicating its product with a ‘Boomerang’ function.

Facebook allegedly took interest in Phhhoto shortly after it launched and had garnered significant following, including from celebrities.  Facebook offered firstly to integrate Phhhoto’s technology with Facebook’s Messenger service, then with its newsfeed after the photo app declined Facebook’s initial offer. However, Facebook apparently abandoned the partnership after ‘legal conversations’ and subsequently revoked Phhhoto’s access to Facebook’s Instagram Find Friends API reportedly because the app’s usage was growing as a result of its relationship with Instagram. Instagram, which is owned by Meta, is also alleged to have withdrawn Phhhoto’s ability to promote itself effectively using hashtags on Instagram’s platform and modified its algorithm to benefit Instagram. Instagram also launched the ‘Boomerang Video App’ hours before Phhhoto’s launch on Android, which is argued to have been a near replica of Phhhoto’s product.

As a result of Instagram and Facebook’s behaviour, the suit claims that Phhhoto suffered a decline in new user registrations and overall user activity in 2016. Phhhoto claims that without such exclusive conduct, the app would be worth far more today.

In September this year, the New York Times published the details of a strategy of Facebook’s, namely ‘Project Amplify’, which allegedly sought to manipulate the algorithm in users’ newsfeeds to benefit Facebook itself. Facebook is already facing legal action from the US Federal Trade Commission and criticism from the House antitrust subcommittee for similar behaviour, including the exclusion of third-party competitor access to its social media platform and reproducing products that compete with those of Facebook.

For more information, you can read the complaint here. This case will be an interesting one to follow. Please contact Tim Cowen with questions.

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Issues in the UK’s forthcoming Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill
    March 17, 2023
  • Stormy weather for cloud computing in the EU
    March 16, 2023
  • Inmarsat Takeover Provisionally Cleared for Take-Off
    March 10, 2023
  • EDPB’s Feedback on the New EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
    March 6, 2023
  • UK Data Reform Bill to return to the House of Commons
    March 3, 2023
  • DCMS Publishes New Security and Privacy Principles for App Store Operators and Developers
    February 16, 2023
  • DPO’s Dismissal & Conflicts of Interest Under The EU GDPR – CJEU Ruling
    February 14, 2023
  • ICO – Change of Deadline for Reporting Breach Notifications for Communication Service Providers
    February 6, 2023
  • General EU Requirements for Cookie Banners – EDPB Task Force Report
    January 27, 2023
  • Ofcom Launches Investigation into BT Following Suspected Breaches of Consumer Protections Post Implementation of EECC
    January 27, 2023
  • Important decision impacting how companies must provide personal data requested by data subjects under their access rights
    January 19, 2023
  • NIS 2 Directive – Enhanced Common Level Cybersecurity Across the EU
    January 12, 2023

The Preiskel Blog

  • Issues in the UK’s forthcoming Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill 17 Mar 2023
  • Stormy weather for cloud computing in the EU 16 Mar 2023
  • Inmarsat Takeover Provisionally Cleared for Take-Off 10 Mar 2023
  • EDPB’s Feedback on the New EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework 6 Mar 2023

Preiskel news

  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, quoted by IT Pro on the costs incurred by MNOs
  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, will be a panellist at GCCM Carrier Community 2023 on IOT
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Awarded First Place as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK
  • Ronnie Preiskel chosen to judge 24 May 2023 The Tech Capital Global Awards
Preiskel tweets
  • Stormy weather for cloud computing in the EU. Find out more at: https://t.co/dOpC8u4wLf4 days ago
  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, quoted by IT Pro on the costs incurred by MNOs. Find out more at: https://t.co/ypgfkhmwLc6 days ago
  • Inmarsat Takeover Provisionally Cleared for Take-Off. Please see further at: https://t.co/Yov4dhP51W10 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy