Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Charles Soden-Bird
    • Nick Bromfield
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Matthew Fox
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Mark Clough
    • Stewart White
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Galyna Carey
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Claire Barraclough
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

Preiskel & Co Partner Tim Cowen quoted in PaRR discussing Google case

July 13, 2017By Preiskel & Co

Preiskel’s Tim Cowen has been quoted by PaRR, in an article[1] published yesterday, discussing the Google case.

The Commission announced its decision on Google shopping on 27 June 2017. However, the question on many people’s minds is when the general public – and those considering follow-on damages claims – will be able to see a non-confidential version of the document.

In a discussion about the possibility that Google exploit confidentiality procedures to delay publication, Tim is quoted by PaRR highlighting that “confidentiality cannot be claimed for matters that are old and have no business significance”.

PaRR refers to Tim pondering the idea that in the context of fast-moving digital markets, the timeframe in which information becomes “old” may be shorter than the five-year presumption laid down by the ECJ in the Evonik Degussa ruling, indicating that 2.5 years may be a more appropriate benchmark.

Anyone with questions about the Google case or who would like to discuss follow-on damages cases should contact Tim Cowen.

 

 

[1] See article entitled “EC Google public decision seen coming quickly – lawyers”.

 

2.42 billion fineAntitrustantitrust enforcementCommission investigationCompetitionCompetition LawDamages claimsEU Google investigationEuropean Commissionfollow-on casesGoogleGoogle fineGoogle remediesGoogle ShoppingMaddi Gaunttechnology and internetTim Cowen
Latest blog posts
  • CMA announces investigation into Apple
    March 5, 2021
  • Council of Europe publishes guidelines on facial recognition
    February 26, 2021
  • Epic Games files antitrust complaint with European Commission
    February 22, 2021
  • Will the UK keep the VABER?
    February 16, 2021
  • CMA publishes Issues Statement in Liberty Global/Telefónica merger inquiry
    January 22, 2021
  • Epic Games, creator of Fortnite, launches claims against Google and Apple in Competition Appeal Tribunal
    January 21, 2021
  • European Commission proposal for Digital Services Act published
    December 15, 2020
  • Facebook faces antitrust lawsuits in the US
    December 11, 2020
  • CMA issues advice for Government on regulatory regime for tech giants
    December 10, 2020
  • New Telecoms Security Law Laid before Parliament for tougher Rules and Fines for Telecoms Companies
    November 25, 2020
  • New Ofcom Consultation on Copper Retirement
    November 23, 2020
  • European Commission releases draft new Standard Contractual Clauses
    November 19, 2020
The Preiskel Blog
  • CMA announces investigation into Apple 5 Mar 2021
  • Council of Europe publishes guidelines on facial recognition 26 Feb 2021
  • Epic Games files antitrust complaint with European Commission 22 Feb 2021
  • Will the UK keep the VABER? 16 Feb 2021
Preiskel news
  • Tim Cowen to speak at Mediaspace panel on 18 March
  • Tim Cowen gives exclusive interview to Mediaspace
  • English Speaking Union (ESU) educational charity appoints Danny Preiskel to its Board of Trustees
  • Law360 reports on Preiskel & Co dispute resolution team case Dynasty Company for Oil and Gas Trading v the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq and Dr Ashti Hawrami
Preiskel tweets
  • The @CMAgovUK announces investigation into @Apple. Find out more here: https://t.co/YQVNzqRMb5 #CompetitionLawyesterday
  • Chair, Antitrust Practice, @TC_4KBW to speak at Mediaspace (@wr_mediabrowser) panel on 18 March. Find out more here… https://t.co/MyxH8lidZg2 days ago
  • Chair of our antitrust practice, @TC_4KBW has given an exclusive interview to Mediaspace @wr_mediabrowser Find out… https://t.co/6Ioii4cf9t3 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel:
+44 20 7332 5640
Email:
info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2021 | Site map | Legal notices | Privacy | Cookie Policy