Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Tina Cowen
    • D A T Green
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Mor Swiel
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Charles Soden-Bird
    • Nick Bromfield
    • Stephen Dnes
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Robert Harvey
    • Martina Raciti
    • Matthew Fox
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Xavier Prida
    • Mark Clough
    • Stewart White
    • Hannah Leader
    • Peter Dally
    • Antony Corel
    • Sue Warwick
    • Galyna Carey
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Claire Barraclough
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

Preiskel & Co Partner Tim Cowen quoted in PaRR discussing Google case

July 13, 2017By Preiskel & Co

Preiskel’s Tim Cowen has been quoted by PaRR, in an article[1] published yesterday, discussing the Google case.

The Commission announced its decision on Google shopping on 27 June 2017. However, the question on many people’s minds is when the general public – and those considering follow-on damages claims – will be able to see a non-confidential version of the document.

In a discussion about the possibility that Google exploit confidentiality procedures to delay publication, Tim is quoted by PaRR highlighting that “confidentiality cannot be claimed for matters that are old and have no business significance”.

PaRR refers to Tim pondering the idea that in the context of fast-moving digital markets, the timeframe in which information becomes “old” may be shorter than the five-year presumption laid down by the ECJ in the Evonik Degussa ruling, indicating that 2.5 years may be a more appropriate benchmark.

Anyone with questions about the Google case or who would like to discuss follow-on damages cases should contact Tim Cowen.

 

 

[1] See article entitled “EC Google public decision seen coming quickly – lawyers”.

 

2.42 billion fineAntitrustantitrust enforcementCommission investigationCompetitionCompetition LawDamages claimsEU Google investigationEuropean Commissionfollow-on casesGoogleGoogle fineGoogle remediesGoogle ShoppingMaddi Gaunttechnology and internetTim Cowen
Latest blog posts
  • CMA publishes Issues Statement in Liberty Global/Telefónica merger inquiry
    January 22, 2021
  • Epic Games, creator of Fortnite, launches claims against Google and Apple in Competition Appeal Tribunal
    January 21, 2021
  • European Commission proposal for Digital Services Act published
    December 15, 2020
  • Facebook faces antitrust lawsuits in the US
    December 11, 2020
  • CMA issues advice for Government on regulatory regime for tech giants
    December 10, 2020
  • New Telecoms Security Law Laid before Parliament for tougher Rules and Fines for Telecoms Companies
    November 25, 2020
  • New Ofcom Consultation on Copper Retirement
    November 23, 2020
  • European Commission releases draft new Standard Contractual Clauses
    November 19, 2020
  • National Security and Investment Bill published
    November 16, 2020
  • Inherited GDPR breach still leads to a record fine for Marriott
    November 3, 2020
  • UK National Data Strategy: a step further away from an adequacy decision under the GDPR?
    October 21, 2020
  • British Airways issued £20 million fine by ICO for data breach
    October 20, 2020
The Preiskel Blog
  • CMA publishes Issues Statement in Liberty Global/Telefónica merger inquiry 22 Jan 2021
  • Epic Games, creator of Fortnite, launches claims against Google and Apple in Competition Appeal Tribunal 21 Jan 2021
  • European Commission proposal for Digital Services Act published 15 Dec 2020
  • Facebook faces antitrust lawsuits in the US 11 Dec 2020
Preiskel news
  • Electric Car Batteries with 5 min charging times produced
  • Tim Cowen to deliver Oxford lecture on 12 February 2021
  • CMA announces investigation into Google Privacy Sandbox
  • Preiskel advised Dubber’s acquistion of UK mobile recording company Speik
Preiskel tweets
  • The @CMAGovUK has published its Issues Statement in Liberty Global/Telefónica merger inquiry. More details here:… https://t.co/D9P8LuRyxU3 days ago
  • Creator of Fortnite, @EpicGames, launches claims against @Google and @Apple in @CATribunal. Contact @TC_4KBW with q… https://t.co/IjzXiFO2fF4 days ago
  • We are excited to see new developments in electric battery technology and what they could do in the future. https://t.co/Tslww9enfa5 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel:
+44 20 7332 5640
Email:
info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2021 | Site map | Legal notices | Privacy | Cookie Policy

   

We use essential and analytic cookies on our website. By continuing to use our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies as set in our Cookie Policy. OKCookie policy