Competition law issues can arise in a wide variety of agreements and business arrangements. Regardless of sector and size, any business needs to be aware of competition law in order to meet its obligations and to protect its rights and position in the marketplace. We provide advisory services on all aspects of competition law.

We can advise businesses generally on how to structure their governance and legal risk systems, tailored to the type and scale of the business concerned. We cover the range of legal specialisations that typically affect technology companies and we can provide advice on intellectual property, data protection and cybersecurity issues that are critical to the technology sector.

Infringement of competition law has serious consequences both for companies and individuals. Contracts can be deemed invalid or unenforceable and egregious breach can even lead to criminal sanctions to the business and some individuals behind it. We can advise on the best ways to address these issues and provide:

  • cost effective diligence and investigatory services to check whether existing contracts are compliant with the current competition law
  • state of the art competition law compliance training programs for technology businesses and their staff
  • review and advice on legal governance, risk control and audit system

Competition law issues can arise in a range of agreements, such as:

Commercial agreements. Competition law issues may arise in agreements that:

  • fix or affect competitor’s independent decisions over prices, terms and conditions
  • set sales territories and sales or market segmentation strategies that involve competitors
  • align different businesses’ economic interests or are specialisation agreements
  • involve sharing of resources, facilities, and products between businesses
  • involve grant of public resources in any form to the benefit of certain undertakings or whole sectors

In technology markets, intellectual property licencing agreements, technology transfer agreements and all types of vertical agreements from distribution to franchising raise complex competition law issues which we can help address.

Investigations and compliance. The nature of the technology industry means that both competition and collaboration are common between businesses. Care is needed in ensuring that agreements and arrangements are compatible with the law and that, where issues arise, the consequences and risks are properly appreciated and strategies are devised to address eventual consequences or to mitigate potential risks.

Corporate structures. Collaboration can take many forms. We have extensive experience on both the corporate and commercial structures used to put in place agreements with a collaborative element such as joint ventures, partial acquisitions and outsourcing agreements. Corporate transactions of all types may raise issues requiring competition law clearance from relevant regulatory and antitrust authorities. With regards to such transactions, we can advise on:

  • jurisdictions and the applicability of the relevant regulatory and antitrust laws
  • timetables and merger clearance project planning
  • contractual issues in merger agreements designed to mitigate merger control risks
  • notifications, presentations and advocacy of transactions before the relevant regulatory authorities

International transactions may be subject to the law of a wide range of jurisdictions. We have considerable experience in advising clients on the applicability of overlapping laws such as telecommunications regulations and financial services laws. In relation to merger control, we are able to act for parties of a merger, or for those who may be interested in raising competition law or wider public interest issues that deserve the attention of the authorities.

State aid. The European Union regulates the measures that involve aid by the Member States to undertakings or to the production of certain goods. State aid measures can take countless forms. EU law prohibits such aid when it distorts or threatens to distort competition in a way that is incompatible with the functioning of the internal market. Furthermore, aid compatible with the internal market cannot be granted without previous notification to and subsequent approval from the European Commission. We have experience in advising both undertakings and public bodies on State aid matters relating to a large number of sectors. We can advise on:

  • agreements, laws and regulations that might involve the grant of aid measures through public resources, before they are signed, adopted or approved
  • submission of complaints for alleged grant of aid measures to competitors
  • defence from State aid allegations in the context of investigation and proceedings initiated by the European Commission
  • litigation before national and European courts

Competition law litigation. Litigation in competition law is increasingly common. We have a leading practice in taking and defending claims for damages before the authorities and the courts. We both manage multijurisdictional litigation on behalf of clients and advise on jurisdictions and complaints to the relevant authorities that may be taken in parallel with litigation strategies. We can help with investigations and evidence gathering and pleadings. We work along with specialist counsel on court advocacy in different courts and jurisdictions.

Funding. Even the biggest companies are conservative when it comes to funding claims. We are familiar with commercial litigation funders and their requirements. We can advise on the typical arrangements required by commercial funders.

  • Tangibility of Software: ‘Seen Is Not Limited to the Unaided Eye, Weighed Is Not Limited to the Butcher or Bathroom Scale, and Measured Is Not Limited to a Yardstick’

    The nature of (video game) software has been disputed from the very beginning. Whilst software’s binary code cannot be perceived by the naked eye, this note will show that it still has physical properties of mass and volume. In this blog, Senior Associate Stephan Buck considers the law – and the science – behind the…

  • Why the Irish backstop issue masks a deeper Brexit concern

    Over at the Financial Times, I have a post which argues that the Irish backstop issue masks a broader concern about Brexit. Put simply: those who are upset at the prospect of the backstop being triggered in 2022 are implicitly admitting that they are not confident that the relationship agreement will be in place by…

  • What the Advocate General said about Article 50

    As well as being a consultant for Preiskel & Co LLP, I am a commentator on law and policy for the Financial Times and also on social media and my personal blog.  This is not part of my work as a solicitor but my commentary may be of interest to clients and others visiting this…

  • EU Net Neutrality Court Decision on Deutsche Telekom’s Zero-Rated StreamOn

    On 20 November the Administrative Court in Köln upheld an earlier 2017 decision by the Bundesnetzagentur (the Federal Network Agency) that Deutsche Telekom’s zero-rated “StreamOn” offer violated net neutrality regulations. As Preiskel & Co Senior Partner and telecoms law expert Daniel Preiskel explained, “we found the court decision interesting and worth noting, especially as the…

  • Two interesting developments in the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica story

    There have been two interesting and potentially significant developments in the ongoing Facebook/Cambridge Analytica story. One is Facebook’s announcement that it is appealing a UK penalty for data misuse. The other is that information relating to Facebook was seized from a business person visiting the UK by a UK parliamentary committee investigating Facebook in respect…

  • Tim Cowen to Speak at the Digital Policy Alliance

    Tim Cowen will be speaking at the Digital Policy Alliance’s round table on “How is Artificial Intelligence affecting Competition and Markets?” on Monday 3 December 2018, 2-4pm. The meeting will be chaired by Lord Clement-Jones CBE, who is the Chair of the House of Lords Artifical Intelligence Select Committee and Co-Chair of the All Party…

  • European Parliament approves European Electronic Communications Code

    Final approval has been given to the European Electronic Communications Code (“EECC“) by the European Parliament. The EECC is a proposed EU Directive which aims to update and consolidate telecoms regulation under EU law, and is designed to support the rollout of full fibre networks, and 5G. It also increases consumer protection by extending rules to…

  • Decision published in Hutchison/Wind Tre Merger

    The EU Commission has recently published the full decision in the Hutchison/Wind Tre merger. The Commission confirmed in its press release of 31 August 2018 that the merger was cleared with commitments. The full decision, now available on the EU Commission website, provides further insight into how the Commission reached its decision. The commitments related…

  • Apple/Shazam merger decision published

    The EU Commission has recently published the full decision in the Apple/Shazam merger. An in-depth competition investigation was carried out by the EU Commission following a Phase II referral in April 2018. The Commission confirmed in its press release of 6 September 2018 that the transaction had been cleared and they had found that it…

  • Ofcom releases latest Business Connectivity Market Review Consultation

    Ofcom has released its latest Business Connectivity Market Review Consultation (“BCMR Consultation”), outlining its provisional analysis of the Business Connectivity Market, provisional Significant Market Power (“SMP”) assessment, and proposals for remedies. Key points to note include a commitment to implementing a consolidated review of residential and business telecoms markets and physical infrastructure by 2021, introducing…

  • CMA announces “stop cartels” campaign

    On 22 October 2018 the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) launched its new campaign. The aim of the campaign is to educate businesses about what is and isn’t lawful, and encourage whistleblowing. This follows research that found that only 57% of businesses surveyed knew that price fixing was illegal, whilst 35% thought that it was…

  • European Union and American officials launch review of Privacy Shield

    European and American officials have recently launched the second annual review of the EU-US Privacy Shield. In a joint press release dated 19 October, the governments together reaffirmed “the need for strong privacy enforcement to protect our citizens and ensure trust in the digital economy.” However, the detailed review comes only weeks after the European…