Preiskel & CoPreiskel & Co
Preiskel & Co
A boutique law firm in London
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Diversity, Social Responsibility, and Pro Bono
  • Services
    • Corporate
    • Commercial
    • Regulatory
    • Competition & Antitrust
    • Data Protection, Privacy, and Retention
    • Intellectual Property
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
  • Sectors
    • Telecommunications
    • IT, Technology, & Internet
    • Media and Broadcasting
    • Websites, Blogging, & Social Media
    • Film & Television
    • Gambling & Online Gaming
    • Leisure & Retail
    • Energy & Minerals
    • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    • Creative Industries
  • People
    • Daniel Preiskel
    • Ronnie Preiskel
    • Tim Cowen
    • Jose Saras
    • Robert Dougans
    • Karthyaeni Vittala
    • Tina Cowen
    • Xavier Prida
    • Martina Raciti
    • Ewelina James
    • Rachael Machado
    • Maria Constantin
    • Peter Dally
    • Richard Stewart
    • Joanna Coombs-Huang
    • Paul Stelges
    • Hannah Leader
    • Alison MacFarlane
    • Ilanit Appelfeld
    • Daniel Oakland
    • Sophia Yakhno
    • Sue Warwick
    • D A T Green
    • Antony Corel
    • Stewart White
    • Mor Swiel
    • Stephen Hornsby
    • Tony Curzon-Price
    • Robert Harvey
    • Shardi Shameli
  • International
  • Blog
  • News
    • Publications
  • Contact
Menu back  

White House’s Economic Report of the President sets out a roadmap to improve competition in digital markets

March 22, 2023By Preiskel & Co

On Tuesday, March 22nd, the White House released the Economic Report of the President (ERP), a full chapter of which is devoted to Competition in the Digital Economy.

See the full report here.

The report summarises that the promised benefits of the internet have been undermined by over-concentration.

Digital markets should be a great vehicle for innovation: they improve transparency across supply chains and can increase competition across a wider area providing greater choice and opportunity for price and quality comparisons. However, as the report notes, no one wants to be on a social network that isn’t used by their friends, and network effects and data imbalances can be used by those with market power to increase the barriers for entry resulting in “winner takes all” market failure.

A dominant social media site is, for instance, an obvious beneficiary of network effects. Even when presented with growing costs of use or markedly reduced quality, the barriers to switch remain restrictively high; users are tied into the dominant network due to the fact all of their friends and family exist on that platform. Facebook, for instance, has exploited its market power to extract more and more data from its locked-in user base, and consequently, drive up the cost of advertising (see the CMA’s Market Study on Online Platforms and Digital Advertising and Dina Srinivasan’s hugely informative paper, ‘The Antitrust Case Against Facebook’, which follows how Facebook initially marketed itself as a privacy-preserving platform before it solidified its unshakeable market position, at which point it shifted gear).

The remedies contemplated are interoperability and data portability. On the subject of interoperability, the chapter’s authors propose open standards which allow communication between different companies’ products: just as SMS text messaging facilitates communications between people on different networks and devices, users of Messenger and iMessage should be able to connect directly. This would “expand the benefits of network effects from the firm level to the market level”, encouraging competition on quality and innovation.

This would enable competition on the merits and is tried and tested as the remedy adopted to address network effects in telecoms.

Relatedly, the report notes that data portability could allow users to switch networks without sacrificing their curated data; so, users of Apple Music would be able to jump to Tidal or Spotify without losing their playlists.

Though data imbalances are raised as a core factor contributing to the market power of incumbents, no proposal is put forward to facilitate wider business to business data exchanges is explicitly countenanced. In this respect, the European bloc, which recently adopted the Data Act, remains (just) ahead of the curve.

Nonetheless, this publication lays out a clear and welcome path forward. As it states, “enforcement has seen renewed attention in the past several years”. President Biden’s mention of “antitrust” in his State of the Union address was the first since 1979, signalling the federal government’s alignment and support for the DOJ’s cases against Google and a flurry of ongoing State action against digital monopolies.

In short, there is a lot to like in the latest ERP. Monopolists now face activist governments on both sides of the Atlantic. This is good news innovation and undoubtedly good news for consumers everywhere.

 

Please contact Tim Cowen and Rachael Machado if you have any questions regarding the above.

 

The material in this article is only for general review of the topics covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its content.

This article is written in English language. Preiskel & Co LLP is not responsible for any translation of all or part of its content into any language.

Latest Preiskel & Co blog posts
  • Apple’s Vision Pro Mixed Reality Headset Unveiled
    June 8, 2023
  • Tired of Cookie Banners? The EU “Cookie Pledge” against Cookie fatigue
    June 7, 2023
  • AI – Cybersecurity and Standardisation – The EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Report
    May 30, 2023
  • Important EU Court decision for publishers and AdTech suppliers 
    May 18, 2023
  • Data Subject Access Requests right to a “copy” of personal data, CJEU Ruling
    May 17, 2023
  • GDPR-compensation for non-material damage not automatic, CJEU confirms
    May 17, 2023
  • Overview of the UAS Ofcom Drone Licence
    May 16, 2023
  • French watchdog directs Meta to change its “discriminatory” ad verification criteria
    May 11, 2023
  • Competition authorities around the world versus dominance in digital markets
    May 3, 2023
  • EDPB clarifies personal data breach notification requirements for non-EU controllers
    April 25, 2023
  • CMA probe spurs Google to change billing practices
    April 19, 2023
  • OpenAI’s ChatGPT banned in Italy
    April 18, 2023

The Preiskel Blog

  • Tired of Cookie Banners? The EU “Cookie Pledge” against Cookie fatigue 7 Jun 2023
  • AI – Cybersecurity and Standardisation – The EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Report 30 May 2023
  • Important EU Court decision for publishers and AdTech suppliers  18 May 2023
  • Data Subject Access Requests right to a “copy” of personal data, CJEU Ruling 17 May 2023

Preiskel news

  • Preiskel & Co participating as co-sponsor of Corum Group’s upcoming London Merge Briefing event
  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, quoted by IT Pro on the costs incurred by MNOs
  • Senior Partner, Danny Preiskel, a panelist at GCCM Carrier Community 2023 on IOT
  • Jose Saras and Xavier Prida Awarded First Place as Data Protection Thought Leaders in the UK
Preiskel tweets
  • Apple’s Vision Pro Mixed Reality Headset Unveiled. Find out more here: https://t.co/ifWRgSMY1r2 days ago
  • Tired of Cookie Banners? The EU “Cookie Pledge” against Cookie fatigue. Find out more here: https://t.co/1SrcVUKUDB3 days ago
  • AI – Cybersecurity and Standardisation – The EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) Report findings. Please find out m… https://t.co/7jJApBSkm211 days ago
Preiskel & Co LLP
4 King's Bench Walk,
Temple,
London
EC4Y 7DL
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7332 5640
Email: info@preiskel.com

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMail
© Preiskel & Co LLP 2023 | Site map | Legal notices | Cookie Policy | Privacy